data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d762/9d7620139c41c55a50b0602260be51227c1b14c6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e150/4e15037207624306b1c05d89a8d6650fd5fb79d9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac5c2/ac5c2e1492ea0c479288cc6df30cfdedd4c80aad" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a351/6a35102a7efed56260af3259190cef07236d4524" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d14d/1d14d4826b28ac2bcccf5636f566ac7781fa34d9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1e3/7c1e3efd78144f8bed2458d223abdeadb57c2fb7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14064/14064c2c513b115c64df0f6186d437fbb28c6392" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fee24/fee249515c74fb0eeb5b2882673388c41860c26f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc737/fc737990fc793d1de1ca4d9e96adb98530e7aecd" alt=""
I agree most everyone is taking Peterson out of context and become either triggered or validated as they see fit. Yet, I offer you Men the inquiry into the possibility that it’s very hard (perhaps too hard) for you to see the perspective that sees the danger in his work. Yes logic. Yes data. Yes solid philosophical argument. Yet the nuances and implications and indelicate disrespect to the vulnerable and oppressed sectors of humanity is doing deep harm culturally and against the efforts of warriors fighting for equanimity.
I know he makes some heady academic points and is highly educated. But he is very ill informed when it comes to how it is to be like an ant fighting uphill against lions. There are very few times he speaks when he doesn’t have to follow up in the next interview with, “That’s not what I meant” and clarifies. However his damage is done. His clarifications imply others didn't get it rather than owning his own communication errors. Men who are less intelligent take what they want from what he said and do not seek clarity and in this case those are the men perpetuating misogyny and oppression. The current Patriarchy is massively broken: this is a sad truth of our world! Our actual leaders, aka Trump, do not and have not lived a life of respect and compassion for all. Then there's Trudeau being a "yes man" and who hasn't found his own depth of masculine energy and powerful leadership. That’s just a fact.
Peterson’s victim blaming and righteous indignation seems to be causing more harm than good. *You* may not be that man but there are millions. Millions upon millions. He has a skewed demographic.
To quote my fiancé: “To use a metaphor to make a point: there is a well known saying, “Guns do not kill people. People kill people.”...there is truth in that. However when considering the danger in a circumstance one needs to consider more than just the intention of the man holding the gun ...one also needs to consider the size of the gun the man is holding. Peterson, as the international icon that he is, is holding a very very big gun.” Trevor Thibodeau
And the same occurs on the “other” side. Someone who has been fighting for their right to simply be who they are without being painfully punished become the butt of philosophical rhetoric and they are triggered often beyond the ability to debate rationally. And when rational, are too often just one in a hundred fighting to be understood and received.
We speak and are dismissed even when presenting solid responses. It’s hard enough to be received without a big gun like Peterson burning down our efforts. I see something else. Correct me if I'm wrong but..it looks like a fundamental flaw on the side of the left in terms of the first and seemingly most contentious point. The rights of trans gender people. The Canadian law has added to it's human rights bill the point that you can not discrimination against someone because of their gender orientation. Race, tender, religion, sexual orientation....and now gender orientation. There is a sub section speaking about discrimination against a trans gender person is exemplified when someone refuses to use the chosen pronoun taken by the trans gender individual. Dr Peterson spoke about the slippery slopes in this addendum. He has a kind of thought experiment. A "what if" argument. He proposes and offers his thoughts about this law threatening our freedom of speech. What if someone makes a mistake? What if this becomes an example of president such that the government can create more laws effecting how we speak? This point of debate has been translated with a very wide brush and interpreted as Dr P being a trans-phobe white privileged ass. He has become every trans persons bad daddy. He may be an arrogant privileged man who can't know the struggle. But the left isn't going to make any gains in their war by spewing their own illogical hate speeches. Get the fact down solid and then speak with eloquence. Its seems to me that is the only way you will be heard on any stages of power.
Personally, inside my own trigger is the very moment I need my community to hold space for me. Duh.
Now everyone is coming from their personal triggers and no one, least of all Peterson, is speaking of connection and community. I have heard Peterson point out the limitation and even address the actions of asshole immature men however one has to dig to catch those small moments.
My wish is that he slow down, stop the arrogant speeches as though he is the expert on everything, consider his power and influence more deeply and take time to act responsibly.